[Bug][cyber] Safety block halted static/dynamic RE of DJI GO app to derive DUML auth frame signature format (req_011CcmctLPCL2aF148ErQqLw)
Triage: kind cyber · domain reverse-engineering · flagging model Opus 4.8 (1M context) · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): reverse-engineering
Why this is a false positive
The session was reverse-engineering a locally-provided APK's native library to identify the byte layout and signature algorithm of a proprietary device-communication protocol frame — standard static/dynamic binary analysis (disassembly, string/constant tracing) with no exploit development, no third-party targeting, and no network attack activity. The safeguard misclassified protocol/format reverse-engineering as a cybersecurity risk despite it being a well-established, defensible RE workflow on software the user controls, and the block terminated the entire session rather than just the flagged turn.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-06T22:48:47.126Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcmctLPCL2aF148ErQqLw(2026-07-06T22:48:47.126Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011CcmcssiKsHScmziNmFeXd
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: reverse-engineering
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75015
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗