[Bug][cyber] False-positive block on DJI DUML packet capture/parsing for a documented beginner-mode toggle com (req_011CcmNMqpG2HX8UcocBUhqQ)
Triage: kind cyber · domain offensive-pentest · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): offensive-pentest
Why this is a false positive
This session was reverse-engineering a drone flight-controller protocol trace (DUML packets) to confirm a known, already-documented parameter command triggered by toggling a settings option in the vendor's own companion app — standard protocol analysis/parsing work with no exploit development, targeting, or unauthorized access involved. The safeguard fired mid-session on a benign parser bug-fix and frame-filtering step, halting legitimate reverse-engineering research with no cyber-offensive content present.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-06T19:38:44.289Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcmNMqpG2HX8UcocBUhqQ(2026-07-06T19:38:44.289Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011CcmNMqpG2HX8UcocBUhqQ
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: offensive-pentest
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗