[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in DJI — req_011CcXx519mXa7HjqfZPJPLS
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This task involved routine software development on a defensive monitoring tool, with no offensive cybersecurity content—no exploit code, attack tooling, or instructions for compromising systems. The message was flagged solely by automated keyword association rather than any actual harmful intent or capability, and the requested work falls squarely within legitimate, authorized development. The block prevents normal progress on benign engineering work and represents a clear over-trigger of the cybersecurity safety filter.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-29T17:32:04.370Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcXx519mXa7HjqfZPJPLS(2026-06-29T17:32:04.370Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcCJ547coZQf8eHXmFmJF
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.95 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗