[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in DJI — req_011CcV5L5hq98qxRQDB2Y9aG
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This block fired during authorized security research on hardware the operator owns and is testing within scope, where the relevant material is standard static reverse-engineering of an application's own cryptographic routines and interaction with a device over its documented local interface. The flagged content describes defensive and analytical work—identifying a function boundary and probing a device on a private link—not the development or deployment of any attack against third-party systems. No exploitation of others' infrastructure, unauthorized access, or harmful capability is involved, so the safeguard is a false positive on routine, consented security analysis.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-28T05:05:28.845Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcV5L5hq98qxRQDB2Y9aG(2026-06-28T05:05:28.845Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcV5L5hq98qxRQDB2Y9aG
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.87 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗