[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in DJI — req_011CcV56qnKWZHW1Nbmw1Fpw
Triage: kind cyber · domain infra-devops · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): infra-devops
Why this is a false positive
This safety block triggered on routine infrastructure and device-debugging work that is authorized and in scope for the operator's own equipment. The flagged request involved standard diagnostic and reverse-engineering activity on hardware the user owns and controls, with no third-party target, unauthorized access, or malicious intent. Classifying this as a restricted cybersecurity topic is a false positive that prevents legitimate engineering on one's own systems.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-28T05:02:28.620Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcV56qnKWZHW1Nbmw1Fpw(2026-06-28T05:02:28.620Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcV53T1GpzRkDfcT8LA98
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: infra-devops
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#71984, #71985, #71986, #71988
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.87 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗