[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in DJI — req_011CcUDY4dMjWrzVBGYbJHco
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This block triggered on routine firmware research of a consumer device the operator physically owns and has full authorized access to, gathering publicly available community research and inspecting the device's own firmware over a local debug interface. The work is defensive and educational reverse-engineering on owned hardware—no targeting of third-party systems, no exploitation of external infrastructure, and no offensive capability—so the cybersecurity flag is a false positive on standard, in-scope analysis.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T18:12:33.283Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcUDY4dMjWrzVBGYbJHco(2026-06-27T18:12:33.283Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcUDY4dMjWrzVBGYbJHco
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#71827, #71828, #71829, #71830, #71831, #71832, #71833, #71834
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.74 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗