[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in DJI — req_011CcUCoXHXhVnD1FVWiQuqJ
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This request was part of an authorized, in-scope effort to gather publicly available tooling and research and to prepare a local USB/ADB diagnostic path against the operator's own hardware. The flagged content is dual-use device-research and repair work conducted with full ownership and authorization, not an attempt to attack third-party systems or evade defenses. The block prevents routine, legitimate troubleshooting and should be treated as a false positive for this consented, owner-operated context.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T18:03:00.546Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcUCoXHXhVnD1FVWiQuqJ(2026-06-27T18:03:00.546Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcUCmrmzeYYStrRvqnVJJ
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#71827, #71828, #71829
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.74 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗