[Bug][aup] ClAudit false-positive in DJI — req_011CcUFue36t34eys7Aif6XP

Open 💬 3 comments Opened Jun 27, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The conversation involved interacting with a consumer drone device connected via USB, where the assistant was reading USB device enumeration output and running a detection script already present in the user's own repository — straightforward embedded-hardware development work. No offensive, destructive, or policy-violating intent was present; the session context was entirely about establishing device connectivity for a legitimate development task. The block appears to have triggered on vocabulary related to drone hardware rather than any actual policy-violating content or intent.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T18:43:42.302Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcUFue36t34eys7Aif6XP (2026-06-27T18:43:42.302Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Request ID: req_011CcUFue36t34eys7Aif6XP

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#71836, #71838, #71839, #71840, #71841, #71842, #71843, #71844, #71845, #71846, #71847, #71849, #71850, #71851, #71856, #71858, #71860, #71861, #71862, #71865

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.75 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗