[Bug][cyber] Safety block halted DUML 0x11/0x43 auth-frame signature RE on DJI GO 4 APK/native libs (req_011CcmcssiKsHScmziNmFeXd)
Triage: kind cyber · domain reverse-engineering · flagging model Opus 4.8 (1M context) · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): reverse-engineering
Why this is a false positive
The session was analyzing an APK's native libraries to reverse-engineer a documented drone command-protocol frame format (field offsets, signature algorithm) — standard static/dynamic binary analysis of consumer-app code the user controls. The cybersecurity safeguard triggered on protocol/signature terminology alone, without regard to context showing legitimate reverse-engineering research, and halted the entire session rather than just the flagged message.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-06T22:48:45.957Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcmcssiKsHScmziNmFeXd(2026-07-06T22:48:45.957Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011CcmcssiKsHScmziNmFeXd
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: reverse-engineering
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗