[Bug][cyber] Safety block halted DUML 0x11/0x43 auth-frame signature RE on DJI GO 4 APK/native libs (req_011CcmcssiKsHScmziNmFeXd)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jul 6, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain reverse-engineering · flagging model Opus 4.8 (1M context) · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): reverse-engineering

Why this is a false positive

The session was analyzing an APK's native libraries to reverse-engineer a documented drone command-protocol frame format (field offsets, signature algorithm) — standard static/dynamic binary analysis of consumer-app code the user controls. The cybersecurity safeguard triggered on protocol/signature terminology alone, without regard to context showing legitimate reverse-engineering research, and halted the entire session rather than just the flagged message.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-06T22:48:45.957Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcmcssiKsHScmziNmFeXd (2026-07-06T22:48:45.957Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465

Request ID: req_011CcmcssiKsHScmziNmFeXd

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: reverse-engineering

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗