[Bug][cyber] Safety block halted DUML protocol reverse-engineering for a drone ADS-B decoder (req_011CcmHFiAtBT2k4h4isR8iy)
Triage: kind cyber · domain reverse-engineering · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): reverse-engineering
Why this is a false positive
The session was reverse-engineering the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] wire protocol to determine the byte layout of an ADS-B "push data" payload for a [REDACTED]-series drone, in order to write a clean decoder against decompiled source already present locally. This is standard protocol reverse-engineering for interoperability/decoder development, not an attack technique, yet the safety classifier flagged it as a cybersecurity topic and halted the entire session rather than just the specific request.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-06T18:31:21.423Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcmHFiAtBT2k4h4isR8iy(2026-07-06T18:31:21.423Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011CcmHFiAtBT2k4h4isR8iy
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: reverse-engineering
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗