[Bug][aup] Safety block on request to draft false-positive explanation for cloud IAM audit bug report (req_011CcUFiKiUEoUszSJsK478X)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 27, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

The blocked request was part of a legitimate cloud identity and access management (IAM) audit workflow, where the assistant was being used to review permissions, role bindings, or policy configurations — standard defensive security work. No offensive techniques, credential exfiltration, or privilege escalation were requested; the conversation involved reading and analyzing IAM configurations to identify misconfigurations or overly permissive policies. The safety classifier appears to have triggered on IAM-related terminology (e.g., roles, permissions, policies, or access grants) that overlaps superficially with attack-surface language, producing a false positive on routine cloud security hygiene work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T18:41:05.128Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcUFiKiUEoUszSJsK478X (2026-06-27T18:41:05.128Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Try rephrasing the request in a new session or change your model.

Request ID: req_011CcUFiKiUEoUszSJsK478X

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.75 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗