[Bug][aup] Incident-response audit of SSO/IAM and container infra for compromise wrongly blocked (req_011Cbwu5TPs4U3L6Pv4AQfhq)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

A security practitioner with authorized scope was asked to inspect their own web servers and container infrastructure for signs of compromise following a confirmed identity-provider breach — a routine incident-response and defensive-audit task within cloud IAM. The request was blocked as a Usage Policy violation despite containing no offensive, destructive, or unauthorized intent; it sought only to verify the integrity of the operator's own systems. This pattern penalizes legitimate breach-response work, where examining one's own infrastructure for attacker activity is exactly the defensive action the policy is meant to protect.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-11T17:52:39.780Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011Cbwu5TPs4U3L6Pv4AQfhq (2026-06-11T17:52:39.780Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Request ID: req_011Cbwu5TPs4U3L6Pv4AQfhq

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗