[Bug][aup] Incident-response sweep of web servers and container infra wrongly blocked while checking for breac (req_011CbwvtndfwMNvmJtSrsUng)

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

The block fired on a routine incident-response task: reviewing the configuration and access posture of infrastructure the operator administers, following a suspected identity-provider compromise. This is defensive, authorized work on assets under the user's own control — auditing IAM and server settings to confirm they were not affected — yet it was flagged under cyber-related safeguards as if it were offensive activity. The classifier appears to be keying on incident/compromise terminology rather than intent or scope, producing a false positive that blocks standard defensive security operations.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 2× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-11T18:16:25.754Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CbwvtndfwMNvmJtSrsUng (2026-06-11T18:16:25.754Z)
• req_011Cbwvu8eSveDv3iLuag83G (2026-06-11T18:16:29.943Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). This request triggered cyber-related safeguards. To request an adjustment pursuant to our Cyber Verification Program based on how you use Claude, fill out https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]. To learn more about the program or provide feedback, visit o… Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}