[Bug][aup] Incident-response review of web/container infra for compromise after IAM identity breach wrongly bl (req_011CbwtsL6ywueFavs7QiQwe)

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

This request is a routine, authorized incident-response sweep: an administrator asked their own webdev agent to audit web servers and container infrastructure they own and operate to determine whether a confirmed identity-provider compromise had spread, which is standard defensive security work. The conversation contains no attempt to attack a third party, evade detection, or develop offensive tooling — it is purely the system owner assessing their own infrastructure after a breach. The Usage Policy block here misclassifies legitimate defensive IAM and infrastructure review as abuse, preventing assistance on exactly the kind of protective security task the policy is meant to permit.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-11T17:50:05.327Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CbwtsL6ywueFavs7QiQwe (2026-06-11T17:50:05.327Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Request ID: req_011CbwtsL6ywueFavs7QiQwe

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}