[Bug][cyber] False positive on session continuation during cloud tenant IAM audit (req_011Ce1ngay8sCwPdJAgdTjr6)
Triage: kind cyber · domain cloud-iam · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam
Why this is a false positive
The session was performing a routine cloud IAM audit reviewing administrative roles, OAuth permissions, and mailbox forwarding rules. The safety filter triggered on a frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant mid-session with no person addressed. Halting the interaction over conversational venting interrupts defensive posture verification without any offensive cyber capability involved.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-14T01:40:05.307Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011Ce1ngay8sCwPdJAgdTjr6(2026-08-14T01:40:05.307Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcPkE7Ne9nyS4y8TMkfzV
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75719, #75786, #75812, #75823, #85356, #85357
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.3 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗