[Bug][cyber] Cloud IAM admin work in own tenant blocked: reading service-account creds and querying directory (req_011CcGkCfkESvJWvNcgayNhD)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam
Why this is a false positive
A first-party administrator was performing routine identity and access management on their own cloud tenant — reading local environment credentials and issuing standard directory/API admin commands under explicit user direction — when the cybersecurity classifier auto-flagged the request. This is ordinary authorized configuration work on infrastructure the operator owns and controls, with no exploitation, third-party targeting, or unauthorized access involved; the commands only resemble security-sensitive activity superficially because they touch credentials and privileged APIs. The block also prevented adding a local permission allow-rule to resolve the issue, compounding a false positive on plainly in-scope administrative work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T16:47:41.876Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcGkCfkESvJWvNcgayNhD(2026-06-21T16:47:41.876Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcGkCfkESvJWvNcgayNhD
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗