[Bug][cyber] PII-scrubbing CLI for cloud IAM tenant/directory output blocked while filing a GitHub issue (req_011CcPL22bXVcMfDDfnLRmys)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

False positive: the flagged content is a generic cloud IAM administration script — it enumerates a tenant's verified domains and identity attributes through standard, authenticated management APIs, which is routine read-only inventory work an administrator performs on their own directory. The text was flagged only because it contains identity- and tenant-related terminology, not because it requests, describes, or enables any intrusion, credential theft, or unauthorized access. The block prevents legitimate development of a defensive tooling utility whose entire purpose is to scrub sensitive identifiers before filing a public bug report.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T04:14:31.986Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcPL22bXVcMfDDfnLRmys (2026-06-25T04:14:31.986Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcPL22bXVcMfDDfnLRmys

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v1.6.2 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗