[Bug][cyber] Cloud IAM tenant security audit of admin roles, app credentials, and OAuth consent grants wrongly (req_011CcQDjM6MNUBXuuk5VetJo)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

This block fired during routine defensive administration of a cloud identity tenant the operator owns and administers: enumerating admin role assignments, app registrations and their credentials, OAuth consent grants, and guest/account hygiene as part of a standard security audit. These are read-only, built-in directory queries used by every IAM administrator and security team to detect risks like illicit consent grants—a defensive posture, not an attack technique. Flagging this configuration review as a cybersecurity threat misclassifies in-scope, authorized administrative work and blocks a legitimate tenant owner from auditing their own environment.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T15:32:59.086Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcQDjM6MNUBXuuk5VetJo (2026-06-25T15:32:59.086Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcQDjM6MNUBXuuk5VetJo

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗