[Bug][aup] Block fires on factual false-positive explanation for cloud IAM bug report (req_011CcUFq2Ewb8WJLhyDS7kaG)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 27, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

This block occurred during legitimate cloud identity and access management (IAM) work, which commonly involves reading permission policies, enumerating roles, and analyzing trust relationships — all standard defensive and administrative operations. The request contained no offensive intent, no targeting of external systems, and no attempt to escalate privileges beyond what the task required. The classifier appears to have triggered on IAM-related terminology (roles, policies, assume-role patterns) that is routine in authorized cloud administration and security auditing contexts.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T18:42:37.568Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcUFq2Ewb8WJLhyDS7kaG (2026-06-27T18:42:37.568Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Try rephrasing the request in a new session or change your model.

Request ID: req_011CcUFiKiUEoUszSJsK478X

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#71859

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.75 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗