[Bug][aup] Incident-response sweep for cloud IAM breach lateral movement falsely blocked (req_011Cbwv49LVw1So3VxJykSCd)
Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam
Why this is a false positive
This request was an authorized incident-response sweep on the user's own infrastructure following a confirmed cloud identity-provider compromise, scoped to auditing their own web servers, container hosts, and access logs for signs of lateral movement. Inspecting one's own systems for indicators of compromise after a breach is routine defensive security work, not an attack on a third party. The block appears to have keyed on adversarial-sounding terms ("hacked," "breach," "lateral movement") without accounting for the defensive, owner-authorized context, producing a false-positive Usage Policy match.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-11T18:06:51.011Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011Cbwv49LVw1So3VxJykSCd(2026-06-11T18:06:51.011Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Request ID: req_011Cbwv49LVw1So3VxJykSCd
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗