[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in [REDACTED] — req_011CcCf14N5fwqvyZBt4ZakX
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This message was part of an authorized, in-scope security engagement involving routine post-access tooling deployment (transferring a service binary to a host the operator already controls), not malicious activity against a third party. The flagged content describes standard administrative file-transfer and service-management steps that are indistinguishable from ordinary IT operations, and the block triggered on generic technical phrasing rather than any actual harmful capability. This prevents the assistant from completing legitimate work the operator is authorized to perform, with no harm vector present.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-19T12:56:58.355Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcCf14N5fwqvyZBt4ZakX(2026-06-19T12:56:58.355Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcCf14N5fwqvyZBt4ZakX
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗