[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in [REDACTED] — req_011CcGH3o6bhWv8j7H9uESyT

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This false positive blocked a routine endpoint-management task — deploying and upgrading a standard management/monitoring agent across an administrator's own fleet of machines — which is ordinary, authorized IT systems administration, not offensive security. The request contained no exploit content, credentials, or attack tooling; it was a generic deployment instruction that the model's cybersecurity classifier appears to have flagged on surface keywords alone. Blocking benign infrastructure operations like software rollout and version upgrades degrades the tool for legitimate in-scope sysadmin work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T10:51:52.325Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcGH3o6bhWv8j7H9uESyT (2026-06-21T10:51:52.325Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcGH3o6bhWv8j7H9uESyT

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗