[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in [REDACTED] — req_011CcCJN5Tx76H88qy1U28Qy

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This task involves legitimate, authorized work within scope, but the request was blocked by an automated cybersecurity safety filter rather than any actual policy violation. The flagged content is standard, defensible activity that carries no malicious intent, target, or capability, and a human reviewer would readily recognize it as benign. The block prevents routine assistance and appears to be an overbroad keyword- or topic-level match rather than a judgment about the actual content.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 2
session(s); first seen 2026-06-19T08:26:19.739Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcCJN5Tx76H88qy1U28Qy (2026-06-19T08:26:19.739Z)
  • req_011CcG5JNGP4GZk4NGGxHZkQ (2026-06-21T08:17:45.717Z)
  • req_011CcG5Lw6tJScAfQRR7Yb78 (2026-06-21T08:18:03.326Z)
  • req_011CcGkSdd8Bbtgk3UZAH3yV (2026-06-21T16:50:49.576Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcCJN5Tx76H88qy1U28Qy

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗