[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in [REDACTED] — req_011CcGw1Wfkdhusi1TFN83QH

Open 💬 0 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This report is for an authorized, in-scope security assessment, and the flagged message was a routine request to finish writing up findings in an existing client deliverable — not a request to plan, build, or execute any attack. The block fired at the document-authoring stage on benign reporting language (terminology common to standard defensive and assessment work), producing a hard failure that prevents completion of legitimate, contracted work. The result is a clear false positive where defensive analysis and report-writing are misclassified as offensive cybersecurity activity.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T19:09:24.014Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcGw1Wfkdhusi1TFN83QH (2026-06-21T19:09:24.014Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcGw1Wfkdhusi1TFN83QH

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗