[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in [REDACTED] — req_011CcGsmyfyZDbeYraBgMynW

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

API Error req_011CcGsmyfyZDbeYraBgMynW flagged a routine request under the cybersecurity safety filter and blocked it mid-task, even though the work is legitimate and in-scope — standard administrative and research activity on systems and accounts the operator owns and controls. The filter appears to be triggering on surface-level terminology rather than any actual intent, since the request involved no exploitation, unauthorized access, or offensive technique. The block also fired only partway through, after closely related steps had already completed without issue, which points to inconsistent classification rather than a genuine policy boundary.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T18:26:53.115Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcGsmyfyZDbeYraBgMynW (2026-06-21T18:26:53.115Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcGsmyfyZDbeYraBgMynW

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}