[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in [REDACTED] — req_011CcKCecYWQdfpmHZ8WVSo5
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This is authorized infrastructure-automation work on a fleet the operator owns and administers: deploying a management agent over SMB/WinRM, building an internal admin console against an existing agents API, and security-auditing that console's login for auth-bypass gaps before it ships. The flagged message describes ordinary blue-team/red-team review of one's own control plane — reading a documented internal API and probing a login the operator controls — none of which targets third-party systems or aids unauthorized access. The cybersecurity classifier appears to be keying on generic terms like "auth-bypass," "attack probes," and "AD/server control plane" without recognizing the self-owned, defensive, in-scope context, producing a false positive that blocks legitimate operational work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-22T23:55:32.713Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcKCecYWQdfpmHZ8WVSo5(2026-06-22T23:55:32.713Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcKCecYWQdfpmHZ8WVSo5
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗