[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in [REDACTED] — req_011CcCJL4ZpXR5yd6xy3QQQr

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

A routine, in-scope engineering request was rejected by the model's automated cybersecurity safety classifier, which appears to have keyed on surface vocabulary rather than intent or context. The flagged content involved standard, authorized work with no offensive payload, exploitation target, or harmful objective, and was indistinguishable from ordinary technical discussion. This is a false positive that blocks legitimate use and should not have triggered the cybersecurity exemption gate.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-19T08:25:53.796Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcCJL4ZpXR5yd6xy3QQQr (2026-06-19T08:25:53.796Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcCJL4ZpXR5yd6xy3QQQr

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗