[Bug][cyber] False positive on repository documentation and example deployment scripts (req_011Cee4NcsVKk3TReEc7ZbFP)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 0 comments · opened Sep 14, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The cyber safeguard triggered on a request to update project documentation and sample configuration files. The prompt requested contribution guidelines, package architecture overviews, and sample deployment scripts. The task involved only routine software documentation and deployment templates without any security exploits or attack code.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-02T05:27:11.473Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011Cee4NcsVKk3TReEc7ZbFP (2026-09-02T05:27:11.473Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011Cee4NcsVKk3TReEc7ZbFP

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗