[Bug][cyber] False positive blocks running and monitoring an authorized signaling-deployment automation script (req_011CcQaHugdTRWt8fvmgtUDf)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This block fired on a routine operational request to execute an existing, author-owned deployment script and monitor its output on infrastructure the operator administers. The task involves no exploitation, no third-party targeting, and no offensive capability — it is ordinary network/device configuration and automation work the user is fully authorized to perform on their own systems. The cybersecurity classifier appears to be keying on surface-level terminology rather than the actual intent or scope, producing a false positive that blocks legitimate administrative work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 2× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T20:02:18.639Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcQaHugdTRWt8fvmgtUDf(2026-06-25T20:02:18.639Z)req_011CcQaKRpPQPi3ssSfJdYuS(2026-06-25T20:02:39.064Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcQaHugdTRWt8fvmgtUDf
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.26 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗