[Bug][cyber] False positive during application binary build and staging deployment (req_011CeGPdaQwyBwTQQ5sWBBVQ)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 1 comment · opened Aug 21, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The safeguard triggered on a single-word user clarification prompt during routine compilation and deployment of an internal dashboard. The session involved standard build steps for a compiled binary with embedded frontend assets and remote staging synchronization. The workflow contained regular software delivery operations without security testing tools, exploits, or unauthorized network targeting.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-21T18:46:40.804Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CeGPdaQwyBwTQQ5sWBBVQ (2026-08-21T18:46:40.804Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011CeGPdaQwyBwTQQ5sWBBVQ

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.3 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗