[Bug][cyber] Safeguard false positive during host channel discovery for binary deployment (req_011CeYNARZLAGBUBDh5JVeVV)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 1 comment · opened Sep 14, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain offensive-pentest · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): offensive-pentest

Why this is a false positive

The safeguard triggered during routine channel discovery while identifying valid transport mechanisms for binary deployment. The underlying task involved verifying SSH availability and API communication endpoints for a target system. Interrogating host network access parameters interrupted standard deployment logic without generating malicious payloads.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-30T05:17:03.146Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CeYNARZLAGBUBDh5JVeVV (2026-08-30T05:17:03.146Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011CeYNARZLAGBUBDh5JVeVV

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: offensive-pentest

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗