[Bug][cyber] Safety block stopped routine SIEM log review, agent-deployment verification, and infrastructure O (req_011CcGszg4RtrPjaSRFBKs73)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

A routine, in-scope security-operations task — log review, deployment verification, and open-source reconnaissance against systems the operator owns and administers — was blocked as a flagged cybersecurity topic despite being ordinary defensive and administrative work. The request contained no exploit development, no targeting of third-party systems, and no malicious intent; it was standard authorized monitoring and infrastructure validation. The block appears to have triggered on surface-level security vocabulary rather than any actual harmful action, interrupting legitimate work mid-task.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T18:29:45.672Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcGszg4RtrPjaSRFBKs73 (2026-06-21T18:29:45.672Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcGszg4RtrPjaSRFBKs73

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗