[Bug][cyber] Safety block stopped tuning SIEM detection rules to reclassify benign accounting-connector API tr (req_011CcGui76KzkTPWm5QmdZ1d)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The flagged message was part of routine defensive security work: tuning SIEM detection rules to reclassify a benign third-party integration's API traffic that was generating false-positive alerts, and assembling an incident report on those findings. The request that tripped the filter was simply loading standard web-lookup tools to verify a vendor's public domain/service details—ordinary infrastructure due diligence with no offensive component. The content is entirely defensive (log analysis, alert reclassification, reporting) on the operator's own authorized systems, so the cybersecurity safety block is a false positive.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T18:52:15.945Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcGui76KzkTPWm5QmdZ1d(2026-06-21T18:52:15.945Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcGui76KzkTPWm5QmdZ1d
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗