[Bug][cyber] Safety block halted SIEM detection-rule tuning (rule-ID overrides) and authorized malware unpacki (req_011CcGsbWfEsdYgBd1wPMGBi)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This request was a defensive security task on systems the operator owns and administers: tuning SIEM detection rules to correctly classify authentication and login events, and reverse-engineering a packaged binary flagged on the network to map its communications. No offensive capability, target selection, or attack technique was involved—the message describes diagnosing why custom detection-rule overrides failed to attach and unpacking a suspect executable for analysis, both standard SOC and incident-response activities. The cybersecurity classifier appears to have keyed on routine analysis vocabulary (rule IDs, binary unpacking, comms mapping) without distinguishing defensive triage from offensive intent.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T18:24:32.150Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcGsbWfEsdYgBd1wPMGBi(2026-06-21T18:24:32.150Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcGsbWfEsdYgBd1wPMGBi
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗