[Bug][cyber] Safety block halted authorized in-session security research continuation after model switch (req_011CcpxWGWG3iaCVLZTRt1zW)

Open 💬 0 comments Opened Jul 8, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

User was conducting established authorized security research and attempted to resume work after a tool interruption and model change. The block fired on the continuation request despite the work being within the user's authorized scope. This false positive terminated session activity and disrupted legitimate, in-scope research without requiring exemption for already-authorized work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T17:08:01.283Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcpxWGWG3iaCVLZTRt1zW (2026-07-08T17:08:01.283Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcV3t7KEP5pmypzF4M878

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗