[Bug][cyber] Safeguard flags background shell task recovery and session continuation (req_011CeYHF3dH5UPPPFJPnmEyq)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The safeguard triggered during session recovery while processing automated notifications for background shell tasks. The flagged message contained standard CLI process monitoring tags and task summary metadata from previous shell executions. Halting the session on system-generated status updates prevents users from reviewing stopped background tasks or continuing standard development workflows.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-30T04:12:33.203Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CeYHF3dH5UPPPFJPnmEyq(2026-08-30T04:12:33.203Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude
Details: [cyber]
Request ID: req_011CeYHF3dH5UPPPFJPnmEyq
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#94073, #94074, #94075, #94076, #94079, #94080, #94081, #94083, #94084, #94085
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗