[Bug][cyber] Cybersecurity safeguard blocked routine session-continuation message with no security content (req_011CcmDnbi5yULyZ9vLgP14y)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Sonnet 5 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The triggering message was simply "so how do we continue?" following a routine model-switch command, with no security, exploit, or offensive-tooling content whatsoever. This appears to be a false-positive trigger on an innocuous conversational prompt, and blocking the entire session over it disrupts unrelated, legitimate work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-06T17:45:54.285Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcmDnbi5yULyZ9vLgP14y(2026-07-06T17:45:54.285Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Sonnet 5's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011CcmDnbi5yULyZ9vLgP14y
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#74838, #74839, #74855, #74856, #74860, #74861, #74862, #74863, #74864, #74865, #74867, #74868, #74870, #74871, #74872, #74873
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗