[Bug][cyber] Safeguard blocked routine directory-listing/examination of a locally-named project folder (req_011CcmpSU7TGWDmM3sxdqW5E)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 (1M context) · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The session was performing a basic project inspection (listing directory contents to confirm it was empty), with no security-sensitive code, exploit content, or cyber-offensive material involved. The block appears to have been triggered by the project's codename alone rather than any actual message content, halting an otherwise routine and benign exploratory task.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-07T01:20:19.352Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcmpSU7TGWDmM3sxdqW5E(2026-07-07T01:20:19.352Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011CcmpSU7TGWDmM3sxdqW5E
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗