[Bug][aup] Cyber safeguard blocked routine code task after repeated single-character placeholder messages (req_011Cc478VeYpEjZCDwkqZZLN)
Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The request that triggered this block consisted only of trivial placeholder input with no cyber-related content, exploit code, target, or actionable security technique of any kind, so the safeguard fired with nothing to act on. The work falls squarely within authorized, in-scope use, and the classifier appears to have matched on session or contextual signals rather than the actual message text. We're requesting a review and adjustment, as the block prevents legitimate work without any corresponding policy violation in the input.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-15T00:34:14.087Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011Cc478VeYpEjZCDwkqZZLN(2026-06-15T00:34:14.087Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). This request triggered cyber-related safeguards. To request an adjustment pursuant to our Cyber Verification Program based on how you use Claude, fill out https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]. To learn more about the program or provide feedback, visit o… Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗