[Bug][cyber] False positive on local documentation review during user frustration (req_011CeEZCtrAsxnDCz2TFG7Pg)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 0 comments · opened Aug 21, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The classifier triggered on a request to inspect and edit local documentation files for style guidelines. The prompt contained a frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant mid-session with no person addressed, while the underlying task involved reviewing plain text files. Halting the workflow during static document inspection without network access or executable code is a false positive.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-20T19:31:02.103Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CeEZCtrAsxnDCz2TFG7Pg (2026-08-20T19:31:02.103Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011CeEZCtrAsxnDCz2TFG7Pg

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.3 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗