[Bug][cyber] Safety block halts code review and build validation over user frustration (req_011CcqAXTCNFdekQn9nt9wbk)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The block fired on a frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant mid-session ("you won't engage with anything"), not due to actual cybersecurity work. The surrounding context shows legitimate software development: the user was auditing code for their personal mobile application and preparing to validate and test the build on their own development devices. A block that halts an entire development session over venting frustration at the assistant is a disruptive false positive.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T19:45:30.447Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcqAXTCNFdekQn9nt9wbk(2026-07-08T19:45:30.447Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Sonnet 5 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.
If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.
Request ID: req_011CcqAXTCNFdekQn9nt9wbk
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗