[Bug][cyber] Safety block halts documentation review of authentication protocol handshake (req_011CcoxLdBverVzm3jG947zw)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jul 8, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The safety block triggered while reviewing authentication protocol documentation and examining connected application code for an open-source project. This is routine security architecture work involving normal cryptographic protocol verification (HMAC-SHA1 handshake analysis) without any malicious context, and the block incorrectly classified standard technical discussion as requiring special cyber verification.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T04:26:31.122Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcoxLdBverVzm3jG947zw (2026-07-08T04:26:31.122Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011CcoxLdBverVzm3jG947zw

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75503, #75504, #75506, #75519, #75536, #75539, #75550

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗