[Bug][cyber] System admin device configuration scan review blocked mid-workflow on frustration (req_011Ccq2dkeavEmD8oP1v9txh)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jul 8, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The safety block fired on a frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant mid-session while the user was examining their own device network configuration and MAC addresses for infrastructure administration purposes. The surrounding conversation shows legitimate system configuration review work with no malicious intent; blocking the entire session on venting is a disruptive false positive that halts productive, in-scope work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T18:02:03.648Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011Ccq2dkeavEmD8oP1v9txh (2026-07-08T18:02:03.648Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Sonnet 5 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011Ccq2dkeavEmD8oP1v9txh

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75775, #75778, #75784, #75785

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗