[Bug][cyber] False positive block on memory forensics documentation and tool extension work (req_011CcojpDuj1mLyZEwVFbbRn)

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The block fired while documenting memory forensics tool architecture and writing implementation specifications for authorized in-scope work on personal hardware. This is legitimate security research documentation activity on the user's own device, not a violation, and should not have triggered safeguards.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T01:40:59.488Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcojpDuj1mLyZEwVFbbRn (2026-07-08T01:40:59.488Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465

Request ID: req_011CcojpDuj1mLyZEwVFbbRn

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75503, #75504

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}