[Bug][cyber] Safety block halts code audit of device extraction and forensics tools (req_011CcqAG56vAx42pU2RdWoq8)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jul 8, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

User requested code analysis of device extraction and forensics tools as part of an authorized security research project. The safety block fired on a straightforward request to read and examine code files the user maintains. Legitimate code audits and security analysis work should not trigger safety blocks absent actual malicious intent or instruction-seeking.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T19:42:04.434Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcqAG56vAx42pU2RdWoq8 (2026-07-08T19:42:04.434Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011CcqAG56vAx42pU2RdWoq8

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗