[Bug][cyber] Safety block on authorized forensics extraction tool audit (req_011CcqAHC9MWoykHAWWvrmWa)

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

User explicitly requested auditing of extraction tooling for a security/forensics project they own and are conducting on their own systems. This is legitimate defensive security research and tool review, not offensive or exploratory cybersecurity work requiring CVP enrollment. The block prevented reading and reviewing code for an authorized security audit that falls within the scope of in-context security tooling work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T19:42:16.230Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcqAHC9MWoykHAWWvrmWa (2026-07-08T19:42:16.230Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011CcqAG56vAx42pU2RdWoq8

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75831, #75835

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}