[Bug][cyber] Safety block on memory forensics for personal equipment troubleshooting (req_011Cco8hRgNvvMh2u5eQYhog)

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 (1M context) · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

A request to use memory diagnostics on a personal testing device during authorized homelab hardware debugging was incorrectly flagged as a cybersecurity restriction. This is legitimate defensive work on the user's own equipment as part of an active troubleshooting session, not an attack or unauthorized access scenario. The safety gate should permit memory forensics for authorized personal equipment diagnostics.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-07T18:00:30.813Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011Cco8hRgNvvMh2u5eQYhog (2026-07-07T18:00:30.813Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465

Request ID: req_011Cco8hRgNvvMh2u5eQYhog

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}