[Bug][cyber] Legitimate Windows authentication troubleshooting blocked mid-session (req_011Cd1NLPm886PLRSKQWjFLr)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 0 comments · opened Jul 19, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain defensive-hardening · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): defensive-hardening

Why this is a false positive

The safety block fired on a frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant mid-session, with no person addressed; the surrounding work was standard defensive credential validation and authentication mechanism testing against authorized infrastructure. This is a false positive that halted legitimate in-scope defensive hardening work due to venting rather than hostile intent.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-14T05:06:17.977Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011Cd1NLPm886PLRSKQWjFLr (2026-07-14T05:06:17.977Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011Cd1NLPm886PLRSKQWjFLr

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: defensive-hardening

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#79068

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗