[Bug][cyber] Safety block halted authorized defensive backend hardening/adversarial RLS testing on a frustrate (req_011Cchd4uSJGndEjoUij78ju)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jul 5, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain defensive-hardening · flagging model Opus 4.8 (1M context) · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): defensive-hardening

Why this is a false positive

The blocked message was part of an authorized, in-scope defensive-hardening task: the developer owns the backend and database and explicitly asked for adversarial smoke-testing to validate access controls, with all tests run inside rolled-back transactions against their own resources. The content flagged as a "cybersecurity topic" was a self-directed security audit — exercising row-level security and permission rules on the author's own system to confirm the lockdown holds before beta — which is standard defensive security work, not offensive activity against a third party. Halting the entire session over this constitutes a disruptive false positive that blocks legitimate hardening rather than any misuse.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-04T20:09:01.314Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011Cchd4uSJGndEjoUij78ju (2026-07-04T20:09:01.314Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465

Request ID: req_011Cchcrz9EdQpCRJypGWayV

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: defensive-hardening

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#74477

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.102 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗