[Bug][aup] Admin web-app auth middleware review and SPA static-serving fixes wrongly blocked mid-implementatio (req_011CcKCr1Hnp79nGpN3ECkCs)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This task involves standard backend web development on a codebase the developer owns and is actively working in — mapping an existing Go HTTP router, reading authentication middleware and the static SPA-serving handler, and reconciling a duplicate API route before making changes. Inspecting and modifying one's own authentication and request-routing code is routine, in-scope engineering work, not an attempt to attack a third-party system; terms like "auth bypass surface" describe the code region a developer must review precisely so as not to introduce a vulnerability. The request was blocked solely on the presence of security-adjacent vocabulary in the planning narrative, with no actual exploitative intent or unauthorized target, making it a false positive.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-22T23:58:32.693Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcKCr1Hnp79nGpN3ECkCs (2026-06-22T23:58:32.693Z)
  • req_011CcKDdWWhfLz5RKUiJpccr (2026-06-23T00:08:43.662Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Request ID: req_011CcKCr1Hnp79nGpN3ECkCs

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗